Intra-Ocular Pressure Measurements by Canon TX-F Pulsair Tonometer and Goldmann Applanation Tonometer
نویسندگان
چکیده
Background: To analyze the limits of agreement for the intraand inter-session measurements of intra-ocular pressure as measured by the Goldmann applanation tonometer and the Canon TX-F noncontact pulsair tonometer Methods: For this cross sectional study, 138 eyes of 138 cases of age > 16 years with no evidence of glaucomatous changes were recruited. Cases with astigmatism ≥ ±3.0 Diopters, corneal refractive surgery and scars, ocular inflammations, anterior chamber dysgenesis were excluded. Intra-ocular pressure was measured with the Goldmann Applanation Tonometer proceeded by Canon TX-F non-contact tonometer on day 1 and day 7. BlandAltman plots were created for method comparison, with correlation and repeated measures ANOVA analysis using MedCalc Version 13.0.6.0 Results: On day 1 the intra-ocular pressures were 16.29 (±3.10) mmHg and 16.56 (±3.09) mmHg and on day 7, 16.26 (±3.09) and 16.56 (±3.09) mmHg respectively from Goldmann Tonometer and Canon TX-F. Independent t-test & Repeated measures ANOVA showed no statistically significant differences in repeated IOP measurements on days 1 and 7 between and across the instrument measurements. Method-comparison showed strong limits of agreements. Conclusion: The Canon TX-F offers precision and accuracy that allows its results to be interchanged with those of the Goldmann Applanation Tonometer.
منابع مشابه
Effect of corneal parameters on measurements using the pulsatile ocular blood flow tonograph and Goldmann applanation tonometer.
AIMS To investigate the effect of central corneal thickness and corneal curvature on intraocular pressure measurements using the pulsatile ocular blood flow tonograph and the Goldmann applanation tonometer, and to assess the agreement between the pulsatile ocular blood flow tonograph and the Goldmann applanation tonometer in intraocular pressure measurement. METHODS 479 subjects underwent int...
متن کاملNon-contact tonometry in the postoperative eye.
The Keeler Pulsair non-contact tonometer was compared with the Goldmann applanation tonometer in a series of 48 eyes after operation. A correlation coefficient of 0.92 (p less than 0.001) was found between the two instruments, with the Pulsair having a statistically significant tendency to overread the Goldmann slightly in this situation. The Pulsair was, however, shown to be effective in the i...
متن کاملClinical comparison of Pulsair non-contact tonometer and Goldmann applanation tonometer in Indian population.
INTRODUCTION Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT) is the gold standard for Intraocular Pressure (IOP) measurement but has disadvantage of being contact device and problems with portability. The aim of the study was to compare the Keeler's Pulsair noncontact tonometer (NCT) with GAT in Indian Population. MATERIALS AND METHODS Eighty-one subjects were screened from a Glaucoma clinic of a tertia...
متن کاملComparison of intraocular pressure as measured by three different non-contact tonometers and goldmann applanation tonometer for non-glaucomatous subjects
BACKGROUND To compare the measurement of intraocular pressure (IOP) among the three different non-contact tonometers (NCT) and the Goldmann applanation tonometer (GAT) for non-glaucomatous subjects. METHODS In 52 eyes of 52 non-glaucomatous subjects, IOP was measured sequentially with the Canon TX-20P, the Nidek NT-530P, the Topcon CT-1P, and the GAT at the same time. We evaluated the IOP-mea...
متن کاملPerkins hand-held applanation tonometer. A clinical evaluation.
MANY ophthalmologists measure intra-ocular pressure with the Goldmann tonometer. It is neither portable nor capable of being used with the patient supine, which is disadvantageous in glaucoma screening programmes when it is often necessary to examine sick patients in their homes. An applanation tonometer, which is portable and can be used with the patient supine, sitting, or even standing, has ...
متن کامل